<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pearls Before Swine</title>
	<link>http://therazor.org/index.php?p=317</link>
	<description>An online journal dedicated to the search for Absolute Truth - whenever and wherever it is found.</description>
	<language>en</language>
	<pubDate>Wed,  2 Mar 2005 17:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://therazor.org/index.php?p=317#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Fri,  4 Feb 2005 02:36:14 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">6184:317@http://therazor.org</guid>
					<description>	Here&amp;#8217;s my beef&amp;#8211;and I&amp;#8217;m not picking on you because the phenomenon strikes me as ubiquitous&amp;#8211;I increasingly think it&amp;#8217;s just plain unseemly to slam other bloggers. If you don&amp;#8217;t like what a guy is doing or saying, and you don&amp;#8217;t want to engage him in discussion, why not, you know, just ignore him?
	I see all these anti-Sully threads and they make me queasy. Perhaps it&amp;#8217;s from the unsettling experience of seeing people do that to me. Yes, I understand, people can talk about whatever they want, but the more time goes on the more I find myself refusing to say anything at all about any blogger whose behavior I don&amp;#8217;t like.
	I think it makes my blog better, I really do.
	(Please don&amp;#8217;t take this personally.)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here&#8217;s my beef&#8211;and I&#8217;m not picking on you because the phenomenon strikes me as ubiquitous&#8211;I increasingly think it&#8217;s just plain unseemly to slam other bloggers. If you don&#8217;t like what a guy is doing or saying, and you don&#8217;t want to engage him in discussion, why not, you know, just ignore him?</p>
	<p>I see all these anti-Sully threads and they make me queasy. Perhaps it&#8217;s from the unsettling experience of seeing people do that to me. Yes, I understand, people can talk about whatever they want, but the more time goes on the more I find myself refusing to say anything at all about any blogger whose behavior I don&#8217;t like.</p>
	<p>I think it makes my blog better, I really do.</p>
	<p>(Please don&#8217;t take this personally.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dean Esmay</title>
		<link>http://therazor.org/index.php?p=317#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Fri,  4 Feb 2005 07:19:14 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">6186:317@http://therazor.org</guid>
					<description>	You know, I take more of that back. I mean it really is a bit much the way some bloggers dogpile on each other, but Sully&amp;#8217;s behavior is genuinely exasperating.
	I also don&amp;#8217;t think he understands something: he&amp;#8217;ll probably never have the kind of popularity he once had again. He&amp;#8217;s blown it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You know, I take more of that back. I mean it really is a bit much the way some bloggers dogpile on each other, but Sully&#8217;s behavior is genuinely exasperating.</p>
	<p>I also don&#8217;t think he understands something: he&#8217;ll probably never have the kind of popularity he once had again. He&#8217;s blown it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Kirwin</title>
		<link>http://therazor.org/index.php?p=317#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Fri,  4 Feb 2005 08:50:17 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">6188:317@http://therazor.org</guid>
					<description>	Dean
Exasperating is the key.
Sullivan is an excellent writer, and some of his posts were downright sublime. Ditto Den Beste - but Den Beste has an excuse (his failing eyesight). 
	Sullivan&amp;#8217;s behavior just makes all of us bloggers look unprofessional. Granted, we&amp;#8217;re not pros, but if we are going to stand up to them we&amp;#8217;re going to have to act like them to a certain degree - and that means not becoming exhausted, not letting the flamers get us down, not giving up.
	I don&amp;#8217;t think Sullivan&amp;#8217;s departure is going to cause any long term damage; events will sweep past him and those of us riding that wave will too. But it does strengthen the position of those who call us rank amateurs.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dean<br />
Exasperating is the key.<br />
Sullivan is an excellent writer, and some of his posts were downright sublime. Ditto Den Beste - but Den Beste has an excuse (his failing eyesight). </p>
	<p>Sullivan&#8217;s behavior just makes all of us bloggers look unprofessional. Granted, we&#8217;re not pros, but if we are going to stand up to them we&#8217;re going to have to act like them to a certain degree - and that means not becoming exhausted, not letting the flamers get us down, not giving up.</p>
	<p>I don&#8217;t think Sullivan&#8217;s departure is going to cause any long term damage; events will sweep past him and those of us riding that wave will too. But it does strengthen the position of those who call us rank amateurs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ligneus</title>
		<link>http://therazor.org/index.php?p=317#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Fri,  4 Feb 2005 09:16:33 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">6189:317@http://therazor.org</guid>
					<description>	I don&amp;#8217;t see why fellow bloggers should be off limit for comment and/or criticism. Surely in the long term it makes blogs more valid, genuine. It&amp;#8217;s part of the problem with the MSM that they&amp;#8217;re like an old boys club and close ranks when one of the them screws up.
As for AS, I know so many people who gave up on him, if not for his lack of backbone over the war and constant over the top harping on Abu Graib, then for his histrionic ranting over gay marriage. Too bad, he really is an intelligent fellow, he just needs to grow up a bit.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t see why fellow bloggers should be off limit for comment and/or criticism. Surely in the long term it makes blogs more valid, genuine. It&#8217;s part of the problem with the MSM that they&#8217;re like an old boys club and close ranks when one of the them screws up.<br />
As for AS, I know so many people who gave up on him, if not for his lack of backbone over the war and constant over the top harping on Abu Graib, then for his histrionic ranting over gay marriage. Too bad, he really is an intelligent fellow, he just needs to grow up a bit.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spicedsass</title>
		<link>http://therazor.org/index.php?p=317#comments</link>
		<pubDate>Fri,  4 Feb 2005 10:07:09 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">6190:317@http://therazor.org</guid>
					<description>	Re: Andrew Sullivan.
I posted recently on Andrew Sullivan and how after having a hissy fit over the&amp;#8230;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Re: Andrew Sullivan.</strong><br />
I posted recently on Andrew Sullivan and how after having a hissy fit over the&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
