Archive for August 2008

I’m Not Watching the Olympics…

And neither are a lot of Chinese either. I do find the “cheer squads” cute, in a Cultural Revolution-type way…

Venues across Beijing were dotted Tuesday by the cheerful cheer squads. At the Fengtai Sports Center Softball Field, about 200 people sporting yellow shirts with “Cheering From Beijing Workers” inscribed on them in English and Mandarin sat in the scorching sun in the outfield bleachers, which were otherwise largely empty. Covering their heads with white caps, towels or pieces of newspaper to stave off the heat, they waved tiny red flags, red fans and inflatable noisemakers. Several described themselves as blue-collar workers who had gotten tickets from their factories or companies and had been schooled in the art of good cheering.

“Today, 50 workers came to do the cheerleading job,” said Wang Li, 30, who works for an automobile manufacturer in Beijing. “Our company sends us to softball today, but other workers were sent to other venues to do some work. We come here on shifts.”

Wang said the workers had been coached. They learned: “Olympics, Go, Go, Go! China, Go, Go, Go! Beijing, Go, Go, Go!”

Said Wang Wei: “The volunteers are assigned to cheer for both sides in order to provide good atmosphere. . . . The responsibility rests with the . . . venue managers. If they find there are not enough people, too many empty seats, [they should] organize some cheerleaders.”


It will be interesting to see what the ratings are here. I haven’t seen a single instant of the games and honestly haven’t had any problem whatsoever avoiding them. Between cable TV, the Internet and the beautiful weather we’ve been having recently, there are much better things to do.

Rolling Stone: Size Doesn’t Matter

I regularly start the morning here in the Philadelphia area with the Preston & Steve show on WMMR. Today they mentioned the fact that Rolling Stone magazine was resizing. Evidently single copies sales of the magazine have been declining as of late, and publisher Jann Wenner believes it is partly due to the magazine’s large format.

The jocks at Preston & Steve may know the real problem for the magazines decline. Preston Elliot mentioned that he let his subscription lapse because the magazine’s politics became “too intense,” specifically citing the mags anti-war cartoons. Casey, another member of the morning crew, noted that the magazine tended to give 5 stars to every Bob Dillon release and implied that the magazine was out of touch with contemporary music. He also wondered how much impact the Internet had on the magazine.

I stopped reading Rolling Stone years ago after Greider became repetitive and PJ O’Rourke started publishing elsewhere. The magazine never reflected my musical tastes which tended towards the underground-side of things. At the time the J Geils Band was gracing its cover I was listening to Bauhaus and Skinny Puppy – two bands that I doubt were ever mentioned in the pages of that magazine let alone profiled.

I’d love to see the magazine’s demographics since I’d bet the average age of Rolling Stone’s readership is deep in Geritol territory. Even when I was in the targeted demographic the magazine seemed to cater more to the ‘60s Generation than to my own, which may be why Spin magazine did so well (at least initially).  More recently Maxim and similar magazines have done well with the young, covering lifestyle and music topics with edgy yet profitable aplomb. I notice that Maxim has twice the circulation as Rolling Stone does, and is thriving on – and off – the Internet.

However Preston Elliot’s comment about the politics of the magazine is dead on given its worship of Barack Obama, a point made all the more apparent in this photo of Wenner taken from the IHT story.

Jann Wenner & Barack Obama Resized Covers
Jann Wenner Seeks Relevance

I’ve discussed Wenner’s efforts on Obama’s behalf here and even suggested the next cover in his Obamassiah series:

The Obamassiah

Perhaps I’ve gotten Wenner’s support of Obama wrong. Maybe he isn’t using his music magazine to push his personal political views; maybe Wenner is hoping that Obama supporters will see Rolling Stone as hip and relevant – just like the candidate himself.

The unfortunate truth is that nothing lasts forever. Rolling Stone’s best years ended in 1976 as its demographic shifted into building careers and families away from creating socialist utopias fueled by pot smoke and Hendrix. Changing its size and having Obama grace even more covers will not make the magazine any more relevant. Like the aging hippies who read it generations ago, it’s time has passed. Like Rolling Stone’s readers have, Wenner needs to move on.

John Edwards: Liar

One of the historical lessons of Watergate is that it’s not the crime but the coverup that in the end becomes more important. Such is the case today with John Edwards and his relationship to 80’s party girl turned videographer Rielle Hunter.

Having an extramarital affair is pretty low, and doing so while your wife is dying from cancer is guaranteed to get you labeled “scumbag” – but the disappearance from the public view, the hiding in hotel restrooms and the incessant denials all leading to the Zeigler-esque reversal is in the end what cocoons John Edwards in scandal.

John Edwards has spent the past several months denying the truth about his relationship; now he’s fessed up but now denies that the baby is his. For now Hunter is protecting him by refusing to allow a paternity test – but Edwards can’t take much solace from that. It’s only a matter of time before the limelight that Hunter craves leaves her and she’s forced to get it back by allowing the test, thereby sealing Edwards’ fate.

Edwards’ behavior during the entire affair says much about his character. It’s hard to imagine that this man was as close to the highest office in the land as he was – presidential candidate in two elections and vice-presidential candidate in one.  The affair with a woman with the morals of a stray cat while his wife slowly succombs to cancer. The lies about the affair. The lies about the lies.

It’s hard to believe that this guy was considered “presidential timber” given how rotten to the core he is.

Control – The Life, Death and Legacy of Ian Curtis

Watched the movie Control. This movie is based on the book by Deborah Curtis “Touching From a Distance,” about her life with Joy Division frontman Ian Curtis.

Control Movie Poster

The fact that I’m writing about this movie says a few things: first that I’m pretty out of touch since the movie was released at Cannes in 2007;  second that at my age I still listen to and like Joy Division. I’m not embarrassed by either of these facts.

For those who don’t know Joy Division was a band that became quite successful in the UK in the late 1970s. On the eve of their 1980 tour in the US Curtis hung himself in the kitchen of his flat. After his death the band later reformed and became New Order which went on to achieve a level of fame and success that no doubt would have troubled Curtis. Nonetheless Joy Division became a prominent band in modern rock, influencing contemporaries like U2 and The Cure (Robert Smith dedicated “Primary” to Curtis) as well as later bands like Nine Inch Nails (who covered Joy Division’s “Dead Souls”) and The Killers, who covered the Joy Division song “Shadowplay.”

Control the movie will appeal to Joy Division, New Order fans – but I doubt it will work for anyone unfamiliar with the music or Ian Curtis’s persona. The movie is shot in black & white which fits the subject well, as anyone familiar with the music will attest. The cinematography is excellent, but I think the movie would have benefited from tighter editing. At least 20 mins of the 2 hour 3 minute long movie could have hit the editing room floor thereby preventing a few dragged out scenes that the movie could have done without.

Where this music truly shined was the acting; Sam Riley channels Ian Curtis in a way that I haven’t seen since Val Kilmer played Jim Morrison (an influence of Curtis’s by the way) in the 1991 Oliver Stone film. The rest of Joy Division – Peter Hook, Bernard Sumner, and Stephen Morris – played by Joe Anderson, James Anthony Pearson, and Harry Treadaway – are played so convincingly that it’s hard for all but the most die-hard Joy Division fans to realize that the four actors playing Joy Division actually played and sang the Joy Division songs in the movie. While I missed Joy Division due to age and geography, I have seen video of the band, and Riley’s portrayal of Curtis is spot on. The spastic dancing, the hiding behind the microphone, the soul-penetrating icy stares – all done perfectly by Riley. Add the fact that the band does not lip synch any of their songs almost sent me to my collection once or twice to compare the songs in the movie to the songs on CD.

Ian Curtis may not be as well known as James Dean, Jim Morrison and more recently Heath Ledger, but his death at the age of 23 just before his band was on the brink of success in the United States has created a similar legacy to those stars who were cut down before their prime. The movie accurately portrays him as an enigmatic figure who viewed his talent as a burden, one that ultimately consumed him.

As someone deep into middle age I recognize such talent as a siren song and know that Talent and its attendant Muses comes in other, less lethal, varieties. Better for Curtis to have lived a quiet life with his wife and daughter in the English countryside like Sting than to have ended his brief life prematurely.  Would Joy Division have made it in the USA had Curtis lived? Would the band have changed modern music as much as it has already if Curtis had lived? No one knows for sure, but I wish that Ian Curtis would have at least tried.

The Council Has Spoken: Aug 08, 2008

Thanks to everyone for some very good posts this week. I’d also like to offer my thanks for quickly responding to my emails; I wish the people at work were half as responsive.

Council:
Votes Title
2.64   Joshuapundit: Winning in Afghanistan
1.98   Wolf Howling: PartIII: Why Exploit Our Domestic Resources
1.65   Rhymes with Right: What is a Windfall Profit?
1.32   Bookworm room: Marin County’s Hidden Conservatives
0.99   The Razor: Red Man in a Blue Family
0.66   Done With Mirrors: Heroes
0.33   Soccer Dad: Hello martyr, hello fatah
0.33   Cheat Seeking Missiles: Time to Fire Bob Herbert

Non-Council:
3.63   Classical Values: Obama Be
2.64   Sigmund, Carl and Alfred: The Forgotten Christians of Lebanon
0.99   American Thinker: Time for an Indifferent World to Take a Stand
0.99   Neptunus Lex: A Difficult Man
0.66   Elder of Ziyon: The definitive version of Hello martyr, hello fatah
0.66   Spiegel Online: China’s Summer of Living Dangerously
0.33   The Baseball Crank: Politics: Racist Campaign Ad Watch

Members, please link to the winners and the full voting (permalink).

Gore’s New Houseboat

... is a hundred footer.

Gore's Houseboat - Courtesy Pajamasmedia

Let’s not forget: Gore made similar claims about the environmental benefits of the solar panels and other “green” additions he made to his 10,000 square foot home in Belle Meade, a cushy neighborhood in Nashville, Tennessee. The environmental savings promised from his “investments” failed to produce the results that he touted. In fact, his “energy efficient” renovations to his home actually INCREASED his electrical consumption by 10% rather than producing the promised reductions. Ultimately, Gore’s water-based excursions on his giant houseboat may prove more environmentally friendly than his fleet of limos, his private jets or his mansion. Perhaps the B.S. One will never live up to its nickname, but the jet ski on the boat is clearly powered by something other than solar or bio-diesel.

Watcher of Weasels: Submitted for Your Approval

The Razor is proud to host the Watcher of Weasels this week.

Submitted for your approval:

Council:
Soccer Dad: Hello martyr, hello fatah
The Glittering Eye: Strategic Objectives in Afghanistan
Bookworm Room: Marin County’s Hidden Conservatives
Cheat Seeking Missiles: Time to Fire Bob Herbert
Done With Mirrors: Heroes
Rhymes with Right: What is a Windfall Profit?
The Razor: Red Man in a Blue Family
Colossus of Rhodey: Obama Wants Slavery Reparations
Wolf Howling: PartIII: Why Exploit Our Domestic Resources
Joshuapundit: Winning in Afghanistan

Non-council:
Elder of Ziyon: The definitive version of Hello martyr, hello fatah
Classical Values: Obama Be
American Thinker: Time for an Indifferent World to Take a Stand
Spiegel Online: China’s Summer of Living Dangerously
New York Times: Grim News for a Paper in New Jersey
Neptunus Lex: A Difficult Man
The Donegal Express: A Karate Man Bleeds on the Inside! Billy Ray Valentine
American Prospect: Our CEOs, Their Foreign Agents
Sigmund, Carl and Alfred: The Forgotten Christians of Lebanon
The Baseball Crank: Politics: Racist Campaign Ad Watch

Give A Shout-Out to GBZI Apparel

While surfing the web looking for design ideas for the Ministry of Propaganda, I ran across GBZI Apparel. Here’s a sample of their wares:

Stay Back or Be Shot t-shirt

As their About Us page notes:

Nemo and Shamu came to the Green Zone Baghdad Iraq with the Coalition Provisional Authority in early 2004 and applied themselves to the task at hand, helping in the reconstruction of Iraq. As time went on, they looked for souvenirs to send home and, for that matter, to wear while in Iraq. They became increasingly frustrated with what was then available in country, i.e. shirts saying “Whose your Baghdaddy” printed in garish colors on polyester-blends. Thus, being style gods of a sort—and figuring that their imagination was at least as good as what was being offered to the Post Exchanges—they decided to design and make a few shirts for themselves and a few friends.

I like their style, and think you will too.

A Red Man in a Blue Family

I just returned back from a trip to St. Louis where I visited a few members of my family. Over the past few decades my family has been moving southward away from the city, but while their location has shifted, their politics for the most part haven’t. They remain Democrats, so it was interesting to hear how they viewed the current election.

My sister’s husband is a former Lutheran minister and a pacifist, so it should be no surprise that he is a devout Obama supporter. While he was around I tended to keep my politics to myself because honestly, I think it’s rude to argue politics with one’s host.

My sister was not as dogmatic. She had been a strong Hillary supporter who now supports Obama. ButI got the impression that this was not based on any of his positions, or even the fact that he had won the primaries: I think she supported him because she loved her husband and knew that her husband really liked Obama.

My 87 year old mother has been living with them. Although her body is gradually failing her mind remains as sharp as ever. Like my sister she too supported Hillary, but her support for Obama was much more tepid than my sister’s. She had worked on both the Kennedy campaigns in the 1960s – an impressive feat considering the size of the family she had to take care of – and supported Obama more so out of party loyalty than anything.

During my stay with them my oldest sister stopped by. Her husband had suffered a stroke four years ago that has left him mostly paralyzed and with extreme difficulty communicating. On top of that she was supporting one of her daughters and her two grandchildren while she divorces her alcoholic husband. Her life has become brutal, but you wouldn’t know it because she handles it with grace and without complaint.

While my other sister’s husband was out of the room, she was extremely discouraged by Obama’s candidacy. I asked her what bothered her about it. “He doesn’t stand for anything,” she said. “He changes his positions whenever it’s convenient.” She also mentioned his lack of experience and “that when he speaks he sounds like he’s talking down to you – like he’s not one of the people.” I asked her about McCain. “He scares me,” she said. “And he’s old, although I’m just about as old as he is,” she added in an afterthought. Big Sister is 67; McCain is 72, but she readily admits to supporting him in 2000.

On the issues health care is highest on all their lists. My mother and oldest sister have all butted heads with HMO and insurance bureaucracy over the past couple of years; they also have significant ongoing medical expenses. My younger sister is more concerned about the economy and the difficulty her boys – ranging in age from 20 to 26 – have had finding decent jobs. But to be fair only one of the three has recently decided on a career path, so I’m not sure how much of her concern is due to perception of the economy and how much is based on reality. Her husband is very concerned about the deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq and opposes both, but he’s also worried about the state of health care in our country and it turns out that there’s very little daylight between our positions on it and a few other social issues like gay marriage.

The price of gasoline matters a lot to all of them – especially the husband who commutes over 60 miles each day. All four voiced their support of increased domestic oil exploration, and the husband and I had a lengthy discussion about solar power which we both support. No one mentioned Global Warming during my five-day stay. Sorry, Al Gore…

My oldest sister is worried about what would happen if Democrats controlled the White House and Congress. “I don’t know why people complain about ‘divided government’,” she said. “It keeps both parties in check.”

I had gone to St. Louis knowing that the household was pro-Hillary but expected to find it just as pro-Obama now that Hillary had lost her party’s candidacy. My impression is that if the election were held today, three of the four would vote for Obama (my oldest sister being the wildcard; she mentioned the possibility of writing in Hillary). I was surprised at how lukewarm his support turned out to be, but in retrospect I suppose it shouldn’t.

My family is solidly middle class. Oldest sister’s husband was a Vietnam war veteran and a lifelong union electrician. Their son has followed in his father’s footsteps (sans the military service) and become a union electrician. Their daughter has her teaching certificate but due to her circumstances has to work at Target while her soon-to-be ex-husband sits at home unemployed and drinks away his family and his career as a research chemist.

The other sister is an elementary school teacher and her husband is an accountant. Their children all have (or will have) college degrees – but they question their value since most of their children haven’t used them yet. Both are religious but disagree with the literal interpretation of the Bible that one of their children espouses – having left his Catholic faith and become Baptist (by the way, this kid supports McCain and has started on his career doing video and flash for the web – the visit was full of surprises).

My mother is a child of the Depression and probably only voted for a Republican once in her life (Gene McNary – who was her county supervisor and later became head of INS under Clinton). She is a smart woman whom I credit for instilling a love of politics and world affairs. Her favorite politician of recent history was her representative Richard Gephardt, and given what I know about her I’d say that she is a “blue dog Democrat” just like he was.

Both sisters, the husband and our mother will vote in November. Missouri has become somewhat of a swing state. So what conclusions can I reasonably draw from this small, extremely biased, sample?

First Barack Obama’s appeal hasn’t excited the populist Democratic base anywhere near as much as it has the “limousine liberal” wing of the party. The populist wing was where Bill Clinton drew his support and consequently where Hillary drew hers. This presents a threat to Obama’s candidacy that isn’t appreciated by the Media or Obama’s advisors, but could explain why Obama isn’t further ahead in the polls than he is at this point in the race.

Second, Obama’s primary positions were aired much more during the struggle with Hillary than they would have been had the primary season gone easier for him. Publicizing these views during the primaries has limited his ability to move towards the center for the general election since any movement in that direction is perceived by the public as flip-flopping. This in turn has created the perception that Obama cannot be trusted and that he will throw Hillary’s supporters “under the bus” when the opportunity presents itself. It is clear to me that this is the source of my older sister’s distrust of him, and possibly my mother’s as well.

Third McCain has to present himself as a bipartisan candidate and emphasize his “maverick” credentials. What is perceived by the GOP establishment as McCain’s problem – his eagerness to buck the party line – would resonate well in my family in St. Louis. While Obama’s positions are well-known, they know much less about McCain’s and it is up to him to play down his Republican affiliation and promote himself as an independent. I’m not sure how much leeway his party can give him to do that, but to win in my family he has to show them who he really is.

So I conclude to win anyone’s vote in my family John McCain must run as John McCain. He has spent his entire career in public service taking positions that are unpopular within his own party, but my family doesn’t know that. What they know is that he’s a Republican, and to my 87 year old mother that’s a pejorative term.

Looking at the four members of my family, my sister’s husband will vote for Obama no matter what. Although I’ve portrayed her as a bit subservient to her husband, she’s far from it; politics just isn’t that important to her as it is to him so barring a major scandal I don’t see her switching from Obama. My oldest sister could be relatively easily convinced to vote for McCain if he promised a better solution to health care than the standard GOP party line. If he put out something good, something daring she’d swing over to him.

And my 87 year old mother? She’ll be a tougher nut to crack, but a decent health care program and reminders of McCain’s bipartisan record and he could move her to his column. Like I said, my mother is a smart lady who can smell BS a mile away. If McCain runs as McCain, she’ll vote for him.

These are good, hard working Americans that make up the heartland of our country. While I might disagree with their politics, I respect their opinions and am reminded that the “opposition” aren’t faceless robots but people within my own family – people whom I love and who amazingly enough love me back.

Will Barack Obama take their support for granted? Will John McCain win them over? I guess we’ll know in 3 months.

Obama Channelling Carter

Pretty soon there will be arena rock, Cheech & Chong movies and gas lines at the pump. Obama is pushing the Windfall Profits Tax. Guess it’s time to don your bell bottoms and boogie on down to the disco. The ‘70s are Baaack!

But seriously, the Wall Street Journal is not amused. It points out that Exxon’s profit margin is 10% and compares it to other industries.

If Senator Obama is as exercised about “outrageous” profits as he says he is, he might also have to turn on a few liberal darlings. Oh, say, Berkshire Hathaway. Warren Buffett’s outfit pulled in $11 billion last year, up 29% from 2006. Its profit margin—if that’s the relevant figure—was 11.47%, which beats out the American oil majors.

Or consider Google, which earned a mere $4.2 billion but at a whopping 25.3% margin. Google earns far more from each of its sales dollars than does Exxon, but why doesn’t Mr. Obama consider its advertising-search windfall worthy of special taxation?

The fun part about this game is anyone can play. Jim Johnson, formerly of Fannie Mae and formerly a political fixer for Mr. Obama, reaped a windfall before Fannie’s multibillion-dollar accounting scandal. Bill Clinton took down as much as $15 million working as a rainmaker for billionaire financier Ron Burkle’s Yucaipa Companies. This may be the very definition of “windfall.”

The Council Has Spoken: 8/01/2008

Congratulations to this week’s winners:

Council: SoccerDad: Hating Israel more than loving palestinians

Noncouncil: Investor’s Business Daily: Barack Obama’s Stealth Socialism

Complete vote here.